Frame the outcome
Define the user, decision, workflow, pain point and measurable acceptance criteria.
DataKnobs does not begin with “Which model should we use?” We begin with the decision or workflow that needs to improve, the data and context available, the users who will act on the result, and the operational constraints. Then we design the smallest useful solution that can grow into reusable capability.
The stages are sequential enough to create accountability, but iterative enough to support experimentation. A small proof point can move quickly; a regulated enterprise workflow may require deeper evidence at each gate.
Define the user, decision, workflow, pain point and measurable acceptance criteria.
Identify systems, documents, signals, permissions, quality issues and lineage requirements.
Choose the right mix of predictive ML, LLM/RAG, agent workflows, rules, UX and integrations.
Use KREATE to assemble the experience and KONTROLS to embed policy, safety and auditability.
Test quality, reliability, cost, latency, edge cases and human acceptance—not only model metrics.
Monitor production, expose KNOBS, compare variants and reuse what works across the portfolio.
The three capabilities are not separate slogans. They correspond to the practical work required to build, govern and improve an AI product.
Assemble data products, assistants, agents, websites, retrieval flows, APIs and operational experiences using reusable components.
Define the policies and evidence required for a production AI workflow to be trusted, reviewed and operated.
Make important choices explicit so teams can experiment, diagnose and tune the system without rebuilding it.
DataKnobs evaluates the system at several levels so a locally impressive model does not become an operational problem after deployment.
Coverage, quality, freshness, permissions, lineage and known gaps.
Accuracy, groundedness, robustness, tool behavior and failure modes.
Human usability, escalation, cycle time, false-alert burden and decision quality.
Whether the workflow creates enough value to justify cost, change and operational risk.
A complaint detector that flags too many normal interactions may overwhelm reviewers. An autonomous agent that produces high-quality recommendations but cannot explain or audit its actions may fail governance. Production validation therefore connects technical metrics to the operating workflow.
Customers can enter through a proven use case, a single platform capability, a custom delivery project or a broader platform program. The delivery model is designed so these paths can converge over time.
Use when the business workflow is clear. Start from a proven solution pattern, adapt it and validate value quickly.
Use when several use cases share a gap such as governance, website generation, RAG, evaluation or experimentation.
Use when an enterprise needs common architecture, controls and operating standards across multiple AI initiatives.
We start with the business decision or workflow, the users, enterprise context and constraints. Model selection follows from those requirements.
KONTROLS defines policy, risk, traceability and production checks; KNOBS exposes measurable configuration so quality can be tested and improved. Governance is part of the design, not a final review step.
Yes. The goal is to reuse successful data, integration, evaluation, control and workflow patterns so the next use case starts farther ahead.
Compare platform, product, proven solution and expert-delivery paths—or bring a specific workflow and let the delivery model determine the smallest useful first step.